Linking problem with CW (relocation truncated to fit: ARM_26)

[jani.nurminen]

Noticed a strange problem while trying to use inline functions..

-- class(CTestBitmap) interface definition :: BEGINING ----------
..
void Clear(const TRgb& aRgb);
..
-- class(CTestBitmap) interface definition :: END ---------------


-- class(CTestBitmap) code :: BEGINING -----------------------
..
inline void CTestBitmap::Clear(const TRgb& aRgb) { ... }
..
-- class(CTestBitmap) code :: END ----------------------------


Compiler complains following:
---------------------------

Errors caused tool to abort.

Link Error : Undefined symbol: 'void TestNamespace::CTestBitmap::Clear(class TRgb const &) (?Clear@CTestBitmap@TestNamespace@@QAEXABVTRgb@@@Z)'

Link Error : referenced from 'void TestNamespace::CTestEngine::ConstructL(void) (?ConstructL@CTestEngine@TestNamespace@@AAEXXZ)' in test_engine.cpp:211

Link Error : Link failed

test_engine.cpp::211 --> iBitmap->Clear(TRgb(255, 0, 0));

So what's wrong? If I take inlining away code works like a charm, but with inline everything is fucked up!

EDIT: Using 6.1 SDK and "relocation truncated.." shows only while compiling to the target device (ARM).

EDIT2: Maybe this a consequence of using factory contructor(NewL)?

[mpinsonneault]

I'd like to see the code where you allocate this object, please. So this error only occurs when compiling for ARM, and not WINSCW? If so, it might be a problem with the GNU C++ compiler.

Regards,

Matt P.

[jani.nurminen]

I'd like to see the code where you allocate this object, please. So this error only occurs when compiling for ARM, and not WINSCW? If so, it might be a problem with the GNU C++ compiler.

Regards,

Matt P.

Problem solved Inlined functions was implemented in .cpp so other compilation units didn't get the implementation (definition) of the inline functions. So I added a .inl file and included that to header..