Archived:Flash Lite Comparison Chart
Archived: This article is archived because it is not considered relevant for third-party developers creating commercial solutions today. If you think this article is still relevant, let us know by adding the template {{ReviewForRemovalFromArchive|user=~~~~|write your reason here}}.
We do not recommend Flash Lite development on current Nokia devices, and all Flash Lite articles on this wiki have been archived. Flash Lite has been removed from all Nokia Asha and recent Series 40 devices and has limited support on Symbian. Specific information for Nokia Belle is available in Flash Lite on Nokia Browser for Symbian. Specific information for OLD Series 40 and Symbian devices is available in the Flash Lite Developers Library.
We do not recommend Flash Lite development on current Nokia devices, and all Flash Lite articles on this wiki have been archived. Flash Lite has been removed from all Nokia Asha and recent Series 40 devices and has limited support on Symbian. Specific information for Nokia Belle is available in Flash Lite on Nokia Browser for Symbian. Specific information for OLD Series 40 and Symbian devices is available in the Flash Lite Developers Library.
Article Metadata
Pros |
Cons |
||
|---|---|---|---|
Flash Lite 1.1 |
- load text data over HTTP/HTTPS |
- cannot save data |
|
Flash Lite 2.0 |
All features of Flash Lite 1.1 and |
- no streaming audio |
|
Flash Lite 2.1 |
All features of Flash Lite 2.0 and |
- no streaming audio |
|
Flash Lite 3 |
All features of Flash Lite 2.0 and
|
- dropped reference to SVG-T support |
Full feature comparison chart here: [1]


The article is rcommnded to developers having intermediate knowledge about FlashLite. Befor starting any projct in FlashLite, it is ncessary to define the target platform depnding upon the pros and cons of platform.
The article compares the possibilities and also the limitations of the different FlashLite versions. This will surely help to decide the target FlashLite platform.